Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3737Re: CRASHME crashes NS 3.0 in less than a second!!!
From: Frank Thomas
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1992 11:59
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1992 11:59
20 lines
1405 bytes
1405 bytes
In article <1992Oct1.113425.27867@cs.yale.edu> pharr-matthew@CS.YALE.EDU (Matthew Pharr) writes: > If I remember correctly, a fair number of Unix systems -aren't- > crashed by CrashMe. Yes, I read SunOS 4.1.2 doesn't crash on sparcs. While 4.1.1 does. > Anyway, what CrashMe does is fork as many > processes as it can and write to memory randomly, in the hopes of > destroying something important that the o/s wasn't protecting > properly. I would assume that the problem NeXTs have with this is the > same old one that comes up when you fork() too many processes or > threads--the panic out of nowhere and lock-up that was discussed > earlier in the thread about what happens when you try to write a > multi-threaded app with, say, 200 threads... > > matt Wrong! Yes it forks, and each son writes random bytes to KNOWN location and then tries to execute this random code. BTW I hope (and believe) that 040 is ok but the OS is wrong. Frank
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct2.115924.763@glocke.hotb.sub.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf.sub.org!incom!orfeo!hotb.sub.org!glocke!frankReferences:
<1992Oct1.113425.27867@cs.yale.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf.sub.org!incom!orfeo!hotb.sub.org!glocke!frank From: frank@glocke.hotb.sub.org (Frank Thomas) Subject: Re: CRASHME crashes NS 3.0 in less than a second!!! Message-ID: <1992Oct2.115924.763@glocke.hotb.sub.org> Sender: frank@glocke.hotb.sub.org References: <1992Oct1.113425.27867@cs.yale.edu> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 11:59:24 GMT Lines: 20