Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3740Re: A Modest Proposal
From: andrew
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 07:59
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 07:59
41 lines
2809 bytes
2809 bytes
In article <tlm.718249912@scl1.al.iastate.edu> tlm@iastate.edu (Dr. T.L. Marchioro II) writes:
>Sadly, there's little to do about it now (except complain, which we're all
>quite good at :-) but perhaps I can offer a better solution to Louis' original
>question --- i.e. a solution with pagenumbering, headers, etc. which runs on
>any NeXT --- which at least "calms the waters" on one aspect of this
>question. Why not have everyone put their documentation in troff?? I
>just checked and troff seems to be fully installed on both my 105 Mb internal
>(I keep a skeleton system in case of "big disc failure") and my external
>whcih has the extended OS. I'm no big troff fan, would have difficulty
>writing a letter in it to be honest, but often get documents in it from
>collaborators and can obey the instructiosn necessary to view and/or
>print it. Associated figures/screen grabs could be in EPS files numbered
>1, 2, 3, ..... which the reader could view as he/she read through the
>document. I would even assume it's trivial to write a shell script
>that would drive the troff file, and it's figures, to a Postscript (or,
>better yet for those with the full OS, TeX) document?
>
>It seems to me this would be a great long term solution since troff comes
>with all Unix systems --- I don't want to pick a fight, but some have
>recently said the NeXT doesn't come with a bundled WP: actually, it comes with
>several, nroff, troff, Edit, TeX, etc. It's just that it doesn't come with
>WriteNow, which has a particularly convenient combination of features, anymore
>--- and there are lots of troff --->> XXXX convertors. Again, I'm no
>troff expert, but is there any reason it couldn't serve as a standard for
>documentation? (I agree that TeX and InfoTeX are out because that would
>just be another screw for those with small discs).
Yuk. Just use whatever Word/Document processor you want and save it
in PostScript format. If you want multi-platform compatibility, then
use FrameMaker (which exists on _every_ platform). FrameMaker is
freely distributable in it's read-only form without the license
string...
andrew
--
andrew@cubetech.com | "We shall not cease from exploration
Andrew Loewenstern | And the end of our exploring
Cube Technologies, Inc. | Will be to arrive where we started
| And know the place for the first time." -T.S. Eliot
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct5.075957.631@cubetech.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!cubetech.com!imladris!andrewReferences:
<tlm.718249912@scl1.al.iastate.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!cubetech.com!imladris!andrew From: andrew@cubetech.com Subject: Re: A Modest Proposal Message-ID: <1992Oct5.075957.631@cubetech.com> Keywords: Peace and Quiet : -) Organization: Cube Technologies, Inc. References: <tlm.718249912@scl1.al.iastate.edu> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 07:59:57 GMT Lines: 41