Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3868Re: Stolen NeXT Station Color
From: Matthew M. Stecker
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 14:43
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 14:43
47 lines
2726 bytes
2726 bytes
[ response to all of the talk about what a security breach it is that someone who steals a machine can, given the right knowledge get access to the system's data ] All of this discussion boils down to one simple truth - namely that once a culprit has physical access to the machine, they can reset the ROM, get access to root, and get at the system's data. Even if the system were structured in such a way that this were impossible, (say a hardwired ROM password that was unchangeable), the culprit can always remove the SCSI drive and mount it up on a machine that he does control, thereby getting at the system's data. I was just wondering if this 'fault' (and it's not necessarily a fault - consider that for every thief that uses this process, probably hundreds of folks legitimately forget their passwords and need these procedures) could be alleviated by some sort of password lock built into the hardware of the drive itself - that is, the drive itself would not become active, no matter what system it was attached to, unless it received a password at boot time. The password would be hard-wired into the drive (so you couldn't reset it by killing the battery), and could be retrieved only by calling the drive manufacturer who would give it away in the same manner that banks give out PIN numbers - they would only mail it to the address on file. The system would be set up to prompt for this at boot time, so that it couldn't be discovered by poking around the system. I suppose that this would work like the security code on my car radio - if the system loses power, it needs an id code to be useful again. I realize that this would be a minor inconvenience, but considering that most (many? I have no real data on this) people keep their machines running continuously, it shouldn't pose too much of a problem - it also doesn't seem like it'd be very difficult to implement. This might not make sense for many sites, but for those who hold extremely sensitive data, it could provide some peace of mind. Just an idea, matthew -- matt stecker | This is my NeXT Computer NeXT Campus Consultant, | There are many like it, UNC School of Law | but this one is mine.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov17.144353.3583@mattcube>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!gatech!concert!mattcube!mattReferences:
<FISCHER.92Nov17014523@steinhaus.iesd.auc.dk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!gatech!concert!mattcube!matt From: matt%mattcube@concert.net (Matthew M. Stecker) Subject: Re: Stolen NeXT Station Color Message-ID: <1992Nov17.144353.3583@mattcube> Sender: matt@mattcube Reply-To: matt%mattcube@concert.net Organization: UNC School of Law, CC for NeXT Computer, Inc. References: <FISCHER.92Nov17014523@steinhaus.iesd.auc.dk> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 14:43:53 GMT Lines: 48