🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4020

Re: Is DOTS needed when using 3.0?

#4020
From: Matthew Dillon
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 18:40
44 lines
2058 bytes
In article <1992Nov15.211707.1287@ramsys.sta.sub.org> ram@ramsys (Reimer A. Mellin) writes:
>Tony Richardson writes
>> I recall seeing something about 3.0 having support built-in (ala djf, DOTS,
>> etc.) for non-NeXT, non-PostScript printers.  Is this true?	If not, do
>> djf and DOTS work with 3.0.	I'm considering upgrading, but don't want
>> to lose the ability to use my DeskJet.
>
>djf ist usable on 3.0. either get the file
>	djf_for_3.0.tar.Z from sonata.cc.purdue.edu in /pub/next/submissions
>or
>	 the same file from ftp.informatik.uni-muenchen.de in
>/pub/next/Utils/printer
>
>Another way is just to recompile djf on 3.0 while getting the file
>/usr/include/sys/table.h from a 2.1 System. This file was split for
>3.0 but one part was miraculously forgotten.
>
>cheers
>	Reimer

    I use djf with my HP500C, for black and white printing it works just
    fine!  This is under 3.0.

    NeXT doesn't really support non-postscript printers all that well, you
    have to hack the printcap.	I'm not sure why they seem to think
    everyone and his mother has (or even wants) a postscript printer when
    the output quality is the same.  Personally, I much prefer my HP.

					-Matt

>--
>Reimer A. Mellin, ram@ramsys.sta.sub.org
>Aidenbachstr. 131/6, 8000 Muenchen 71,
>+ 49 89 79849411
>--
>Reimer A. Mellin, ram@ramsys.sta.sub.org
>Aidenbachstr. 131/6, 8000 Muenchen 71,

--

    Matthew Dillon		dillon@Overload.Berkeley.CA.US
    1005 Apollo Way		uunet.uu.net!overload!dillon
    Incline Village, NV. 89451	ham: KC6LVW (no mail drop)
    USA 			Sandel-Avery Engineering (702)831-8000
Technical Details
Message-ID: <dillon.0rik@overload.Berkeley.CA.US>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!overload!dillon
References: <1992Nov13.203949.4310@chiton.ucsd.edu> <1992Nov15.211707.1287@ramsys.sta.sub.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!overload!dillon
From: dillon@overload.Berkeley.CA.US (Matthew Dillon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Subject: Re:  Is DOTS needed when using 3.0?
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <dillon.0rik@overload.Berkeley.CA.US>
References:  <1992Nov13.203949.4310@chiton.ucsd.edu> <1992Nov15.211707.1287@ramsys.sta.sub.org>
Date: 22 Nov 92 10:40:23 PST
Organization: Not an Organization
Lines: 45