Re: lha vs compress

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc

Article #4100

Back to comp.sys.next.misc Previous Next

#4100

From: Mark Adler
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 06:32

7 lines
636 bytes

>> In general lha offers better compression than zip. Best

Maybe zip 1.1, but not zip 1.9--it does consistently better than lha.
And is faster, as you noted.

mark

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1h9154INNsaa@gap.caltech.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!madler

References: <dillon.0t23@overload.Berkeley.CA.US> <1992Dec22.095509.9898@amylnd.stgt.sub.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!madler
From: madler@cco.caltech.edu (Mark Adler)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Subject: Re:  lha vs compress
Date: 23 Dec 1992 06:32:04 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <1h9154INNsaa@gap.caltech.edu>
References: <dillon.0t23@overload.Berkeley.CA.US> <1992Dec22.095509.9898@amylnd.stgt.sub.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

Reply to Parent Message