Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4164Re: The Future of Next, Inc.
From: Joe Rosenfeld
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 21:30
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 21:30
95 lines
4679 bytes
4679 bytes
In article <1992Dec27.165047.8180@squid9.cuc.ab.ca> terry@squid9.cuc.ab.ca (Terry Wilcox) writes: > In article <1992Dec27.015305.27995@leland.Stanford.EDU> > underdog@leland.Stanford.EDU (Dwight Joe) writes: > > Hi everyone. > > > > This is my "anniversary" post since about 1 year ago, I posted an > > article pointing out that Mr. Job's announcement of a public stock > > offering was really an attempt to raise the value of the stock so that > > those with a vested interest could unload all their (eventually > > worthless) stock. I also pointed out that if Mr. Jobs were smart, > > he would switch the central processor in upcoming Next machines to > > a SPARC chip and would switch manufacturing facilities to someplace > > like Thailand. (By "smart", I mean, "wanting a company that is > > profitable.) > > > > Somehow I doubt that your predictions will ever be taken seriously. If you > really knew so much, you would have your own multi-million dollar company and > you would be charging for advice. So, if you are not a "professional" consultant then nobody should listen to you?? Are you a professional critic? > > > Well, I was laughed off this place. True, I did err about the stock > > announcement; Mr. Jobs did announce that the company _would_ go public > > but _had_ not yet gone public at the time. (I erroneously thought that > > he had already gone public.) Several people pointed out--huffy and puffy > > --that Next was doing fabulously well and should not switch to a SPARC > > chip and that moving manufacturing facilities to Thailand wouldn't > > help a bit. > > > > Thailand wouldn't help a bit. NeXT would merely get stuck with the image of > child-prostitution promoters. And look at the current round of protectionism > rising in the States. NeXT would be crushed by tariffs if it manufactured in > Thailand. It's better off staying where it is or moving to Canada or Mexico > (NAFTA makes the two attractive). I think you are correct here. > > > Think again. > > I just did. It still doesn't make sense to sell the factory (at a loss) and > move offshore (especially Thailand). > > > I just read the status of Next, Inc. in the latest issue of the > > Economist. The line in the 1st paragraph reads, approximately, > > > > "Next, Inc. has yet to turn a profit". > > > > Since NeXT is a privately owned company, it doesn't have to release numbers to > anyone. I wonder where the Economist got its facts? > > > At the end of the article, it notes that a high-ranked official had > > jumped ship and moved to Sun Microsystems. Mr. Job laments that > > Sun may yet crush the daylights out of his company. > > > So Bud Tribble left. Big deal. We all know about it. If you read the newsgroups > more often than once a year, you would realize this is old news. Your once a > year posting means you miss most of the news generated over the year. He never said he READS only once a year. Had a bad holiday, did you, hmmm?? > > > So, if Mr. Jobs is reading this, I wish him well and again offer the same > > advice. Keep R & D in the USA but move _all_ manufacturing facilities > > to Thailand. For crying out loud, use the Matsushita-designed 64-bit > > SPARC chip. So, what do you care if people laugh because you chose > > the SPARC chip? You will earn enough money to _burn_. > > I still don't get it. NeXT hires professionals whose sole purpose is to make > sure NeXT isn't wasting money. Along comes some nobody with free advice. Should > Steve: > > a) listen to trained professionals > b) listen to some nobody > c) none of the above. This is argumentative. Who cares if Jobs is listening to your classes? this person has the right to make a posting and the right to be wrong also. You have the right to criticize anyone you want, and I have the right to point out you sound like you are having a bad day. > > Terry Wilcox > -- > Terry Wilcox | 'Next to the originator of a good sentence > terry@squid9.cuc.ab.ca | is the first quoter of it.' > NeXTmail welcome | - RALPH WALDO EMERSON Cowboy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec28.213055.5841@news.csuohio.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!news.uakron.edu!news.csuohio.edu!newsReferences:
<1992Dec27.165047.8180@squid9.cuc.ab.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!news.uakron.edu!news.csuohio.edu!news From: cowboy@trans.csuohio.edu (Joe Rosenfeld) Subject: Re: The Future of Next, Inc. Message-ID: <1992Dec28.213055.5841@news.csuohio.edu> Sender: news@news.csuohio.edu (USENET News System) Organization: Cleveland State University References: <1992Dec27.165047.8180@squid9.cuc.ab.ca> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 21:30:55 GMT Lines: 95