Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4230DOS disks vs. NeXT disks
From: Michael B. Johnson
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1993 03:55
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1993 03:55
17 lines
1093 bytes
1093 bytes
As has been pointed out to me gently by a few people, disk duplication involves a byte-by-byte copy of a disk, and works the same whether it's a DOS, NeXT, MAC, or whatever filesystem. Therefore it was probably the very reason M Carling suggested which had TELOS put a DOS disk with Simson & Mike's book, and not anything to do with DOS disk duplication being any easier or cheaper than NeXT disk duplication. Sorry for any confusion my holiday addled comment might have caused. Sigh. Back to thesis hacking... -- --> Michael B. Johnson --> MIT Media Lab -- Computer Graphics & Animation Group --> (617) 253-0663 -- wave@media-lab.media.mit.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan3.035520.8937@news.media.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!enterpoop.mit.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!waveShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!enterpoop.mit.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!wave From: wave@media.mit.edu (Michael B. Johnson) Subject: DOS disks vs. NeXT disks Message-ID: <1993Jan3.035520.8937@news.media.mit.edu> Sender: news@news.media.mit.edu (USENET News System) Organization: MIT Media Laboratory Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 03:55:20 GMT Lines: 17