Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4243Re: RS/6000 and NeXT Machines
From: Michael McCulloch
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 05:27
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 05:27
44 lines
2730 bytes
2730 bytes
henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu (Charles Henrich) writes: > >duca@binah.cc.brandeis.edu (Karen Duca, a.k.a. Rocky) writes: > >>My group is considering getting a NeXT as a client machine for an RS/6000. >>Seeing as the RS has been such a "delight" to use since we got it several >>months ago, I want to make sure that this mating is compatible before we >>go ahead. Any suggestions from people who are working with these two >>machines now? What software is the best for running X-Windows on the NeXT? > > >The next is the *worse* machine in the world to do Xwindows on. (IMHO). >Your better off going with something like the Sun ELC, or Sun Classic. The >reasons for NeXT doing a bad job are fairly straightforward, first of all >the mouse is only two buttons, secondly the resolution of a NeXT is much >less than a Sun doing X. > >My experiences are with the PD X implementation and Co-Xist > I strongly disagree with the answer given by Charles above. IMHO this info is outdated. Anyway, the real information requested regards the _performance_ and _compatibility_ of X on a NeXT. I recently took advantage of the demo offering for Cub'X Windows on the NeXT, and was pleasanlty surprised at both the speed of display and interoperation with other X machines (we use SGIs as our main servers). Cub'X is plently fast (comparable with our 486s with ISA accelerators) and has had no problem with 8-bit pseudo colormaps with our main application (Patran). As far as the third mouse button, Cub'X allows the use of the ALT key as a modifier to get the third mouse button -- which I think works fine. I use a 25 MHz Colorstation with 32 MB of RAM. I don't understand the above comment on resolution -- unless 1280x1024 is what Charles is used to. I really think the days of unacceptable, even pathetic, X performance on the NeXT are over. Check out Cub'X and/or the new, speedier Co-Xist 3.0. If you like the NeXT for things other than just X, then I think the NeXT will work fine for most things. CPU performance aside (that's a rather important aside I admit) the NeXT works very acceptably as an X-terminal, IMHO. Of course, if you desire to customize your X environment, be prepared to delve deeply into several X configurations files as usual... Michael McCulloch Huntsville, AL
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan4.052741.7766@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!lmcculloShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!lmccullo From: lmccullo@nyx.cs.du.edu (Michael McCulloch) Subject: Re: RS/6000 and NeXT Machines Message-ID: <1993Jan4.052741.7766@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account) Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci. Date: Mon, 4 Jan 93 05:27:41 GMT Lines: 44