🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1g7r1cINNal@agate.berkeley.edu> nweaver@soda.berkeley.edu > 
> 	The problem with the POWER chip is that Apple/IBM will probably
> demand rather through controll.  Go with the 88110, which has been  
described
> as a perfect chip for // processing. 
> 
> 	However, this argument is moot.  NeXT will continue to produce  
it's
> on hardware, probably on Moto chips (68040/68060, maby 88110), and  
porting
> it's OS to the bulk machines for those who bought the wrong computer in  
the
> first place (Intel chips), Hopefully SPARC is next on their list.   
(Imagine
> one of those multi-processor Sun SPARC's running NeXTstep??  I'm  
starting to
> drooll....  :)
> 
> 	For their OWN hardware, they won't use the Intel architecture.  It
> is not as good as the Motorola architecture they are using now, and for
> NeXT, the chip itself isn't really going to matter that much.  Also,  
NeXT
> can't compete with the manufacturing costs against the Intel based  
clones.
> The machines NeXT makes will always look better then the comporable  
Intel
> machiens that NeXTstep is running on, simply because the NeXT hardware  
is
> designed to work very well with NeXTstep.  (I would not like to live  
without
> MY DSP, what about you??)
> -- 
> Nicholas C. Weaver                                 
nweaver@soda.berkeley.edu
> It is a tale, told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, .signifying  
nothing.


I'm hearing NeXT is bringing out an Intel based machine !!!
Hal   hfp@macadam.com