Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4325Re: 100 Mips Intel NeXT.
From: Andrew Loewenstern
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 11:35
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 11:35
42 lines
2644 bytes
2644 bytes
In article <mike.724093217@starburst.umd.edu> mike@starburst.umd.edu (Michael F. Santangelo) writes: >If anything I think (my own $0.02(US)) that NeXT would only gain respect >for using HP-PA. It's a very respected company with a very much respected >RISC architecture that is [not] closed. Common misconception. PA is really killer, but Pentium already has better name recognition than PA, and it's not even out yet! Sure, unix weenies like you and I know about PA, but most of the people NeXT is trying to sell computers to don't. >Most anyone can port to the backward compatible Intel 808x processor family... >(UNIX requiring an 80386 or better). Not alot of pride in it. Only thing >NeXT gains in going completely to the Intel family is reduced development >costs by not needing to support more than one architecture. If NeXT produced a Pentium based machine, it would be a wildly different beast from, say, a Dell Pentium PC. The Sun 386i, most of the Sequents (I think), and Scitex boxes all run on 80386s or 80486s, but none of them will run either DOS or eachother's operating systems. Same deal with old HP-Apollo's, Amiga's, Macintoshes, and NeXT's. There's a lot more to a machine than it's processor. So NeXT would still have to support another architecture (in the form of different device-drivers and other machine dependant code). Steve Jobs doesn't think people should care about what processor is in the box. He's absolutely right, and I agree with him. So he doesn't think that, technological issues aside, NeXT needs use a processor for marketing reasons. Unfortunately, on the planet the rest of us live on, people really do seem to care about what processor is in the box, even if it's for all the wrong reasons... perhaps that's one of the reasons why NS486 is going to be a smashing sucess compared to NeXTstations. andrew -- andrew@cubetech.com | "C++'s runtime sucks shit! Virtual functions Andrew Loewenstern | can go straight to hell!" - Ron Pomeroy Cube Technologies, Inc. | ForYourEyesOnly public key: 0000000701B61D1ADF0DFC9C16185CEA055200000007EB4A9FEB1922065D471A89E905B5
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec13.113539.25552@cubetech.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!cubetech.com!imladris!andrewReferences:
<1992Dec8.205422.746@qb.rhein-main.de> <1992Dec10.090411.12142@ichips.intel.com> <mike.724093217@starburst.umd.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!cubetech.com!imladris!andrew From: andrew@cubetech.com (Andrew Loewenstern) Subject: Re: 100 Mips Intel NeXT. Message-ID: <1992Dec13.113539.25552@cubetech.com> Organization: Cube Technologies, Inc. References: <1992Dec8.205422.746@qb.rhein-main.de> <1992Dec10.090411.12142@ichips.intel.com> <mike.724093217@starburst.umd.edu> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 11:35:39 GMT Lines: 42