Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4354Re: 100 Mips Intel NeXT. - Performance mesurement
From: Gerhard Moeller
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 07:51
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 07:51
49 lines
2757 bytes
2757 bytes
In article <1992Dec8.205422.746@qb.rhein-main.de> vhs@rhein-main.de (Volker Herminghaus-Shirai) writes: [...] > MIPS for computer chips is just as meaningless as revs/min is for > car engines, especially if they are claimed by intel. True. [...] > Never trust anything before SPECint92/SPECfp92 (not that they are > especially trustworthy...). Not really. For example on superscalar processors (SPARC) this isn't a good test, either. [some good comments which I can agree with deleted...] One thing I will never understand: People tend to "measure" their cars in terms of horsepower and speed, their houses in squaremeters, their girlfriends in (...) ... and finally their computers in terms of "MIPS". As a statistican once said: "We don't know what to measure and why -- but we do a damn good job on it!" But "performance" and "usability" is a much more complex topic. Terms as functionality, integrity, robustness and psychologic impacts are MUCH more relevant to it as any speed. For example I work MUCH more productive (objectively) on my NeXT as I do on a big MVS system or even a DEC. (Though they are much "faster") Of course sometimes I am waiting for my NeXT (at the moment my swapfile is about 60 MByte big) and some jobs require a higher speed (Mathematica, rendering and some other jobs) -- but who of us really needs that? Most of the time my system is waiting for me -- not vice versa. You always need the right tool for the right purpose. Same with cars. A friend drives a Porsche 928 Cabrio -- quite fast car with many HP -- but once you had to sit in the back you start hating it. No family car. (And in the US you couldn't even drive it fast...) Just my impression, Gerhard. -- +---------------------------< principiis obsta! >---------------------------+ N Gerhard Moeller, Teichstrasse 12, 2900 Oldenburg (FRG) [*: 02/21/1968] N e Private: gemoe@proximus.north.de Phone (voice): +49-441-75520 e X Uni: Gerhard.Moeller@arbi.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE NeXTmail X T Z-Net: Gerhard.Moeller@uniol.zer encouraged! T +-> NoGeNUG - Northern German NeXT User Group: NoGeNUG@proximus.north.DE <-+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec11.075151.20942@proximus.north.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!Germany.EU.net!uniol!proximus!gemoeReferences:
<1992Dec8.205422.746@qb.rhein-main.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!Germany.EU.net!uniol!proximus!gemoe From: gemoe@proximus.north.de (Gerhard Moeller) Subject: Re: 100 Mips Intel NeXT. - Performance mesurement Message-ID: <1992Dec11.075151.20942@proximus.north.de> Sender: gemoe@proximus.north.de Organization: Gerhard Moeller, German NeXT User Group, Oldenburg. References: <1992Dec8.205422.746@qb.rhein-main.de> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 07:51:51 GMT Lines: 49