Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4371Re: 100 Mips Intel NeXT.
From: Yamanari
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 12:50
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 12:50
26 lines
1683 bytes
1683 bytes
In article <1992Dec14.165125.4207@cubetech.com> andrew@cubetech.com (Andrew Loewenstern) writes: >They wouldn't be competing with clones. A NeXT box based on Pentium >would be very different from a Pentium PC. Just as Amigas, >Macintoshes, and NeXT's are all different. Sequent and Scitex put out >boxes with 486's in them and they don't compete at all with PC's. OTOH, these boxes would be running NS486, right? What "features" could NeXT put into these machines to take them out of the (*fierce*)Intel-box competition? A DSP? There are DSP cards now and coming. Sound? Same. Video? Frankly, there are already better alternatives to the NeXT video (if the current display standard and/or the fiasco with the NeXTDimension are any example). HD floppy drives?? They could add things, sure, but if they radically changed the architecture, they would be breaking compatibility--and who wants to buy an Intel box if it's too incompatible to run anything but NS--might as well buy a slab. -- "If you can't eat sand, why the hell are you living in a desert?" Nuclear redevelopment for a better world!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec15.125034.22432@wam.umd.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!wam.umd.edu!rsrodgerReferences:
<1992Dec13.032244.6133@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1992Dec13.052608.17922@wam.umd.edu> <1992Dec14.165125.4207@cubetech.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!wam.umd.edu!rsrodger From: rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari) Subject: Re: 100 Mips Intel NeXT. Message-ID: <1992Dec15.125034.22432@wam.umd.edu> Sender: usenet@wam.umd.edu (USENET News system) Nntp-Posting-Host: rac1.wam.umd.edu Organization: University of Maryland, College Park References: <1992Dec13.032244.6133@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1992Dec13.052608.17922@wam.umd.edu> <1992Dec14.165125.4207@cubetech.com> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 12:50:34 GMT Lines: 26