Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4436Re: Interest in Full Motion video, without hardware.
From: Eamonn O'Brien
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 02:25
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 02:25
41 lines
1712 bytes
1712 bytes
John, I just happened to see the following on the net. I have no idea what the context of the discussion is. By the way I saw some of your software being demo'ed at the Stanford University bookstore earlier this year. All the best, Eamonn O'Brien-Strain eob@well.sf.ca.us ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In <18105@mindlink.bc.ca> Peter_Roosen@mindlink.bc.ca (Peter Roosen) writes: >> Mike Dixon writes: >> >> Msg-ID: <mdixon.723269021@thelonius> >> Posted: 2 Dec 92 04:03:41 GMT >> >> Org. : Xerox PARC >> >> Peter_Roosen@mindlink.bc.ca (Peter Roosen) writes: >> >> >I have to disagree. With standard decompression techniques your arguments >> >are valid. But there do exist video compression technology capable of >> >delivering 60:1 or more video compression, maintaining a very high quality >> of >> >video. >> >> you're missing the point. it doesn't matter how good your compression >> algorithm is; you still need to have 30MB/s going from your processor >> to your video ram. it isn't going to happen on your current hardware. >> >> .mike. >What? With a serious compression scheme only data that changes from frame to >frame needs to be updated. Where is this figure of 30MBs from. I would like >to see some math. >Peter Roosen
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<eob.724559157@well.sf.ca.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!well!well.sf.ca.us!eobReferences:
<18105@mindlink.bc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!well!well.sf.ca.us!eob From: eob@well.sf.ca.us (Eamonn O'Brien) Subject: Re: Interest in Full Motion video, without hardware. Message-ID: <eob.724559157@well.sf.ca.us> Sender: news@well.sf.ca.us Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link References: <18105@mindlink.bc.ca> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 02:25:57 GMT Lines: 42