Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4454Re: NS486 Confusion
From: Peter Roosen
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 18:03
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 18:03
32 lines
1679 bytes
1679 bytes
> Gary K. Jacobs writes: > > Msg-ID: <1992Dec16.124603.2736@ornl.gov> > Posted: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 12:46:0 > > Org. : Oak Ridge National Laboratory > > I am looking into a 486 system for home use that I will be able to > use NS486 on when it comes out. I thought that this would be a simple > purchase. Ugh! Now I remember why I abandoned PCs 3 years ago to > purchase a real NeXT! Trying to spec out a system now that I am > confident will run NS486 next year is a nightmare. First, it is > difficult to get a "fact sheet" that is factual about what is needed. > There are some incredible discussions going on in the intel and ibm > newgroups about NS486. That is the good news, they certainly are > aware of it and are interested!. The big discussion right now is the > Cyrix 486SLC chip versus "real" 486SX & 486DX chips. There is also > confusion about video cards and bus requirements. > > If anyone in NeXT_Land can provide a clear statement about hardware > requirements for NS486, it would be a huge contribution. > > gary When at Comdex last month I talked to the people at Epson. They make a machine called the progression, which uses the Winengine graphics accelerator. It currently runs NS486, quite well to. I would suggest you get in touch with your local Epson dealer. Peter.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<18612@mindlink.bc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!rsoft!mindlink!a4194Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!rsoft!mindlink!a4194 From: Peter_Roosen@mindlink.bc.ca (Peter Roosen) Subject: Re: NS486 Confusion Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 18:03:01 GMT Message-ID: <18612@mindlink.bc.ca> Sender: news@deep.rsoft.bc.ca (Usenet) Lines: 33