Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4528Re: lha vs compress (use zip instead)
From: Matthew Dillon
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 19:40
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 19:40
33 lines
1728 bytes
1728 bytes
In article <1gt7p3INNa8s@gap.caltech.edu> madler@cco.caltech.edu (Mark Adler) writes:
>
>>> to anyone who is having disk-space problems that unix 'lha' (of lharc
>>> fame) does a hellofabetter job compressing stuff the compress.
>
>And zip does better than lha, and is faster. And is far more portable.
>And works as a filter. And lots more. It is on the usual NeXT archive
>sites in both source and compiled forms. It is also on the NeXT
>Educational Sampler CD.
>
>If you want the very best compression, you can pay a quite reasonable
>price and get Squash, which in its high compression mode compresses
>better than zip, but at the cost of being rather a lot slower.
pkzip is better then lharc, but generally not better then lha. (make
sure you are using lha, which is the -lh5- compression algorithm). I
could be wrong, the only zip I have is on an IBM and I've no idea what
version it is. zip *is* faster.
I tend to use lha/lharc because I can run it on my Amiga, PC's, AND my
NeXT box.
-Matt
>Mark Adler
>madler@cco.caltech.edu
--
Matthew Dillon dillon@Overload.Berkeley.CA.US
1005 Apollo Way uunet.uu.net!overload!dillon
Incline Village, NV. 89451 ham: KC6LVW (no mail drop)
USA Sandel-Avery Engineering (702)831-8000
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<dillon.0t23@overload.Berkeley.CA.US>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!overload!dillonReferences:
<dillon.0t0e@overload.Berkeley.CA.US> <1gt7p3INNa8s@gap.caltech.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!overload!dillon From: dillon@overload.Berkeley.CA.US (Matthew Dillon) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Re: lha vs compress (use zip instead) Distribution: world Message-ID: <dillon.0t23@overload.Berkeley.CA.US> References: <dillon.0t0e@overload.Berkeley.CA.US> <1gt7p3INNa8s@gap.caltech.edu> Date: 19 Dec 92 11:40:20 PST Organization: Not an Organization Lines: 34