Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4846Re: Compression for the archives ( was: Drive drive)
From: Bill Kooiman
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:07
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:07
17 lines
1353 bytes
1353 bytes
In article <1993Jan27.170859.11489@steggie.mtview.ca.us> steggie!eric (Eric Fronberg) writes: > I've been watching from afar the discussions of Disk space vs a new > compression technique used on the NeXT archives and wanted add some > input of how to deal with additional compression on the archives. > > The source of FTP is generally available. Why not modify FTP do all > the compressing/uncompressing on the users behalf. Any worthwhile > compression scheme could be used (zip, gzip, perhaps even a command > line version of squash, if it exists) ... > Wouldn't this lead to increased the traffic on the net? Because you would be sending uncompressed versions around. This would be especially difficult for people running via modems. --Bill
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1k6q1eINNqai@shelley.u.washington.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!pacbell.com!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!news.u.washington.edu!newsReferences:
<1993Jan27.170859.11489@steggie.mtview.ca.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!pacbell.com!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!news.u.washington.edu!news From: billk@rose.apl.washington.edu (Bill Kooiman) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Re: Compression for the archives ( was: Drive drive) Date: 27 Jan 1993 20:07:10 GMT Organization: University of Washington Lines: 17 Distribution: usa Message-ID: <1k6q1eINNqai@shelley.u.washington.edu> References: <1993Jan27.170859.11489@steggie.mtview.ca.us> NNTP-Posting-Host: rose.apl.washington.edu