Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4864Supra / DFax = Good Fax, Little Bux (Re: ZyXEL vs. Supra)
From: Casimir J Palowitch
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 14:30
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 14:30
46 lines
3042 bytes
3042 bytes
In article <1993Jan28.005057.28136@fcom.cc.utah.edu> yf5990@u.cc.utah.edu (Yan Fang/Humanities) writes: >In article <SHIN.93Jan27015456@sgtp.sgtp.apple.juice.or.jp> shin@sgtp.apple.juice.or.jp (Sugou Shinichirou) writes: >>In article <BmaNXB4w165w@student.business.uwo.ca> g3steen@student.business.uwo.ca (Garnet Steen) writes: >> >> I am ready to go with one of these fax modems and I want to hear >> what people's experiences with them are, since I am not familiar with >> either modem. Which do people 'in the know' recommend? Any horror >> stories? >> >>It is clear that ZyXEL is much much better than any other modems >>(including Supra) if you use NXFax driver. >>Shin'ichirou Sugou (NeXTmail acceptable) >> >That may not be true. >I have ordered an eval copy of DFax from Dale Pratt. DFax is the NXFax >equivalent for Supra. >If DFax for Supra works as well as NXFax for ZyXEL, then a Supra is >equivalent to a ZyXEL for faxing, blowing whistles, etc.--at half the price. >Yan Fang-Magnusson I have been using DFax for about two weeks now to send faxes with excellent results. Have not tried to receive yet, but I have been using data and fax one right after the other with no hassles (data with kermit 5a). The Supra fax/modem / DFax combination is indeed much less $ for much the same functionality. Totally transparent once installed. One thing I am looking forward to is the ambitious future plan of DFax to integrate voice / data / fax in an all-in-one-box solution. Supra is actively involved in implementing voice-mail type support as an upgrade option for the future. If DFax does as good a job supporting that as they have done the fax driver, it should be a Good Thing. Something to put on the wish list... A De-install option, which would replace the original kernel.config and getty files that DFax modifies when, for instance, one wants to change peripherals between ports or temporarily use a given serial port for something else. All in all, the Supra/DFax solution for NeXT is a reliable and functional communications solution at about the minimum possible price, for those of us with cash constraints. -- ** Casimir J. (Casey) Palowitch - In 1996, there will be two kinds ** ** Slavic Cataloger - of computer professional : those ** ** U. of Pgh. Library Systems - who know NeXT, and those ** ** cjp+@pitt.edu - without Jobs. **
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2707@blue.cis.pitt.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!bogus.sura.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pitt.edu!cjpReferences:
<BmaNXB4w165w@student.business.uwo.ca> <SHIN.93Jan27015456@sgtp.sgtp.apple.juice.or.jp> <1993Jan28.005057.28136@fcom.cc.utah.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!bogus.sura.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pitt.edu!cjp From: cjp+@pitt.edu (Casimir J Palowitch) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Supra / DFax = Good Fax, Little Bux (Re: ZyXEL vs. Supra) Message-ID: <2707@blue.cis.pitt.edu> Date: 28 Jan 93 14:30:04 GMT References: <BmaNXB4w165w@student.business.uwo.ca> <SHIN.93Jan27015456@sgtp.sgtp.apple.juice.or.jp> <1993Jan28.005057.28136@fcom.cc.utah.edu> Sender: news+@pitt.edu Organization: University of Pittsburgh Lines: 46