Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #4998Re: BIOS upgrade to LBA mode or workaround?
From: Helmut Heller
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:00
43 lines
3271 bytes
3271 bytes
In article <u2WmqXB#9GA.273@uppssnewspub05.moswest.msn.net> "Ovidiu Popa" <opopa@imt.ro> writes: > Helmut, good that you mentioned UNIX here. You probably know that generally > UNIX doesn't use the BIOS INT13 (it implements his own INT13 routine). > Moreover, many Linux systems can't be installed on HDD's using the BIOS LBA > mode. Therefore, the 540Mb limit is not a problem for UNIX machines. The > only request is that all the boot files should be in the CHS mode 540Mb > space. Therefore, it's possible that "flashing" or replacing the BIOS to be > unnecessary. I am using NeXTSTEP (NS) and you are right and wrong: it uses BIOS for things like NS-fdisk to partition the disk, and it is said that once the disk is formatted and all it can do without BIOS translation. However, I experimented for more than a week with different strategies and could not get it to work. The only thing that consistently works is using BIOS-LBA mode to partition the disk and to also use the disk, under WIN95 as well as under NeXTSTEP (UNIX). Therefore I am still looking for the binary image of an LBA-able BIOS for my old 486-board with the SIS461 BIOS chip-set? Anyone willing to share? > Anyway, if your BIOS is not flasheable, the chances to find an upgrade are > small. True, true. That is why I ask here. Maybe s.o. has such a BIOS and can mail me a copy of his EPROM. > I don't think that writing a new BIOS is worth of - it will probably > more expensive than a new Pentium computer. Well, burning a new EPROM doesn't cost me (close to) anything, and would sure be worth saving all the hassle of trying to make it work somehow with the old non-LBA bios. So I am still searching for a kind soul sharing their LBA BIOS with me! Helmut -- Servus, Helmut (DH0MAD) ______________NeXT-mail welcome_________________ FAX: +49-89-280-9460 "Knowledge must be gathered and cannot be given" heller@lrz.de ZEN, one of BLAKES7 Phone: +49-89-289-28823 ------------------------------------------------ Dr. Helmut Heller Leibniz-Rechenzentrum (LRZ)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<704hhn$gfp$1@sparcserver.lrz-muenchen.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<u2WmqXB#9GA.273@uppssnewspub05.moswest.msn.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1102f1,7d623859374d4b4a X-Google-Attributes: gid1102f1,public X-Google-Thread: 1035b6,4a175642383f9f01,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1035b6,public X-Google-Thread: 10e1c9,7d623859374d4b4a X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c9,public X-Google-Thread: faced,7d623859374d4b4a X-Google-Attributes: gidfaced,public X-Google-Thread: f75c9,7d623859374d4b4a X-Google-Attributes: gidf75c9,public X-Google-Thread: f71eb,7d623859374d4b4a X-Google-Attributes: gidf71eb,public From: heller@lrz.de (Helmut Heller) Subject: Re: BIOS upgrade to LBA mode or workaround? Date: 1998/10/15 Message-ID: <704hhn$gfp$1@sparcserver.lrz-muenchen.de> X-Deja-AN: 401302955 Distribution: world References: <u2WmqXB#9GA.273@uppssnewspub05.moswest.msn.net> Organization: [posted via] Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Muenchen (Germany) Reply-To: heller@lrz.de Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc,microsoft.public.win95.general.discussion,abg.ms-dos,comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.os.msdos.misc,microsoft.public.mshardware.product