Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #802Re: Top 10 reasons why you should buy a NeXT instead of an automobile
From: Sherwood Botsford
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 15:45
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 15:45
20 lines
1336 bytes
1336 bytes
Todd M. Swan writes > In article <1992Apr6.015956.1071@csus.edu> eps@futon.SFSU.EDU (Eric P. Scott) > writes: > > Top 10 reasons why you should buy a NeXT instead of an automobile > > > > 6. Exhaust isn't fatal > > > > If you consider radiation to be "exhaust" then this could be debateable... :-) > Come now. The two aren't in the same league. Despite all the studies (most of them badly flawed) the connection between VLF EMF from a terminal and health hazards is somewhere between zero and very small. Even if you take the worst case studies as gospel, the use/loss ration (# of hours of terminal use divided by the expected loss of lifespan) is enormous. Tens of thousands, I bet. Now if you want to argue about the fields underneath high tension powerlines... sgb
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr7.154522.15075@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!access.usask.ca!kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca!newsReferences:
<1992Apr6.203248.11483@newshost.lanl.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!access.usask.ca!kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca!news From: sherwood@space.ualberta.ca (Sherwood Botsford) Subject: Re: Top 10 reasons why you should buy a NeXT instead of an automobile Message-ID: <1992Apr7.154522.15075@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca> Sender: news@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca Nntp-Posting-Host: fenris.space.ualberta.ca Organization: University Of Alberta, Edmonton Canada References: <1992Apr6.203248.11483@newshost.lanl.gov> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 15:45:22 GMT