Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #829Re: Neuron (really networking NeXT vs. Mac)
From: Nathan F. Janette
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 19:17
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 19:17
22 lines
1383 bytes
1383 bytes
In article <1992Apr7.170906.10148@utstat.uucp> philip@utstat.uucp (Philip McDunnough) writes: > One of the Mac's stronger points has been networking. > Appletalk is very nice and using it remotely is even > nicer. If anything it's the NeXT that has so far been hard > to integrate into mixed networks. While I often find Philip's critisism of various NeXT follies on target, I have to disagree with the above point. As far as I've seen, NeXTstep and the machines have supported unix networking out of the box, and 3rd parties have offered connectivity solutions for Mac networking. The Mac is the opposite. How does that make the Mac better? -- Nathan Janette "I'm a NeXTstep man, Dept MB&B, Yale Univ I'm a NeXTcube guy" New Haven, CT nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu (NeXT)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr7.191741.12260@cs.yale.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!cs.yale.edu!newsReferences:
<1992Apr7.170906.10148@utstat.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!cs.yale.edu!news From: nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu (Nathan F. Janette) Subject: Re: Neuron (really networking NeXT vs. Mac) Message-ID: <1992Apr7.191741.12260@cs.yale.edu> Sender: news@cs.yale.edu (Usenet News) Nntp-Posting-Host: jacobi.biology.yale.edu Reply-To: nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu Organization: Yale University, Department of Computer Science, New Haven, CT References: <1992Apr7.170906.10148@utstat.uucp> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 19:17:41 GMT Lines: 23