Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #93Re: IconBuilder: A [harsh] commentary - was Re: Icon, or equivalent under 3.0
From: Robert_La_Ferla
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 23:14
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 23:14
7 lines
619 bytes
619 bytes
In article <1992Oct27.164010.9568@wuecl.wustl.edu> brian@wucs1.wustl.edu (Brian) writes: >I am extremely disappointed with IconBuilder. Ditto. Robert La Ferla
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct29.231421.2656@hot.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!spdcc!merk!esplanade!robertlReferences:
<1992Oct27.164010.9568@wuecl.wustl.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!spdcc!merk!esplanade!robertl From: Robert_La_Ferla@hot.com Subject: Re: IconBuilder: A [harsh] commentary - was Re: Icon, or equivalent under 3.0 Message-ID: <1992Oct29.231421.2656@hot.com> Sender: robertl@hot.com Reply-To: Robert_La_Ferla@hot.com Organization: Hot Technologies References: <1992Oct27.164010.9568@wuecl.wustl.edu> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 23:14:21 GMT Lines: 7