🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.sys.next.misc
3 messages
3 total messages Started by Jon H. Bohlke Wed, 12 Aug 1992 01:27
ModPlayer?
#1014
Author: Jon H. Bohlke
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 01:27
6 lines
598 bytes
Hey,
   How do I unpack this stuff?  I have this ModPlayer.squfold file, what  
utility do I use?

Jon
Re: ModPlayer?
#1021
Author: David Lemson
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 02:26
16 lines
1055 bytes
bohlkejh@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Jon H. Bohlke) writes:


>Hey,
>   How do I unpack this stuff?  I have this ModPlayer.squfold file, what  
>utility do I use?

Use 'UnSquashOnly', available from the pub/next/2.0-release/binaries
directory on sonata.cc.purdue.edu.  
I think this probably belongs in the FAQ (what to do with a .squfold
file).
-- 
David Lemson                                                 (217) 244-1205
University of Illinois NeXT Campus Consultant  / CCSO NeXT Lab System Admin
Internet : lemson@uiuc.edu                 UUCP :...!uiucuxc!uiucux1!lemson 
NeXTMail accepted                                   BITNET : LEMSON@UIUCVMD
Re: ModPlayer? (Plus commentary)
#2025
Author: Gordon Van Huizen
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 17:00
39 lines
2270 bytes
In article <1992Aug12.012734.5064@cs.rose-hulman.edu>  
bohlkejh@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Jon H. Bohlke) writes:
> 
> Hey,
>    How do I unpack this stuff?  I have this ModPlayer.squfold file, what  
> utility do I use?
> 
> Jon

It's compressed with a utility called Squash. A free-ware decompressor  
called UnSquashOnly is available on the archives. There are some comments  
in the MOD Player FAQ (which is by now a decent candidate for sumbission  
to the archives itself) about which mode of UnSquashOnly to use (I believe  
it's Extract Bundle).

THIS IS EXACTLY WHY using non-standard file compression techniques is  
problematic. How many times has this question been asked now about this  
ONE file? While the goal of shrinking files as much as possible is a noble  
goal, it leads to all this confusion. My guess is that the net bandwidth  
of answering questions about files compressed by alternate compressors is  
larger than the amount of bandwidth saved by using a tighter compresstion  
technique! And the ironic thing is that it's EVERYBODY'S resources being  
affected - not just the supplier and user of the compressed file. Is this  
REALLY in our mutual best interests? A note in the README file about how  
to decompress the thing would be some help, but only if the README file  
gets downloaded/shipped around/read.

Things like Squash are great as long as all parties concerned are aware  
it's being used. But out in the open world I think the benefits go to  
waste. Maybe if the extension was UnSquashMe... :-)

Gordon


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Van Huizen           vox: 619.488.9411  fax: 619.488.3045
Metrosoft                   gvh@metrosoft.com [NeXTmail welcome]
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads