Re: Project Manager Questions

Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer

Article #1021

Back to comp.sys.next.programmer Previous Next

#1021

From: Christopher Songer
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 17:29

12 lines
1036 bytes

pfkeb@kaon.SLAC.Stanford.EDU (Paul Kunz) writes:
>
>It is indeed called ProjectBuilder and that's the appropriate name
>because it does NOT support revision control.  
>

Wow... That really bites -- I was afraid of it though. I'm fairly
surprised NeXT didn't include Source Code control. Afterall, having
a built in code library system would be a big plus for mission
critical apps. Ah Well..... Bummer. 

-Chris

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep02.172906.170661@lexmark.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!ukma!lexmark!songer

References: <1992Sep01.184348.147083@lexmark.com> <1992Sep1.222913.9343@dvorak.amd.com> <PFKEB.92Sep2073609@kaon.SLAC.Stanford.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!ukma!lexmark!songer
From: songer@lexmark.com (Christopher Songer)
Subject: Re: Project Manager Questions
Message-ID: <1992Sep02.172906.170661@lexmark.com>
X-Disclaimer: These views are the poster's and not necessarily those of Lexmark
Sender: usenet@lexmark.com (News Dude)
Nntp-Posting-Host: 9.51.7.57
Organization: Lexington, KY
References: <1992Sep01.184348.147083@lexmark.com> <1992Sep1.222913.9343@dvorak.amd.com> <PFKEB.92Sep2073609@kaon.SLAC.Stanford.EDU>
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 17:29:06 GMT
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message