Re: gdb questions

Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer

Article #1098

Back to comp.sys.next.programmer Previous Next

#1098

From: Paul B. Poh
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 13:51

15 lines
987 bytes

In article <1992Sep3.173353.13243@pencom.com> alex@laos (Alex D. Nghiem) writes:
>  What happended to the following commands in gdb in NS 3.0?
>
>  * history
>  * pclass
>  * editmode

Well isn't that interesting. Those commands haven't been in gdb since gdb
3.5. Does that mean that gdb in NeXT 3.0 is no longer 3.1 but maybe 3.5 or
higher. 

--
Paul Poh                        Unix Systems Programmer
ppoh@amethyst.tcs.tufts.edu     Computer Services, Tufts University

Technical Details

Message-ID: <PPOH.92Sep4094512@amethyst.tcs.tufts.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!decwrl!bu.edu!news.tufts.edu!amethyst.tcs.tufts.edu!ppoh

References: <1992Sep3.173353.13243@pencom.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!decwrl!bu.edu!news.tufts.edu!amethyst.tcs.tufts.edu!ppoh
From: ppoh@amethyst.tcs.tufts.edu (Paul B. Poh)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer
Subject: Re: gdb questions
Message-ID: <PPOH.92Sep4094512@amethyst.tcs.tufts.edu>
Date: 4 Sep 92 13:51:37 GMT
References: <1992Sep3.173353.13243@pencom.com>
Sender: news@news.tufts.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Tufts University - Medford, MA
Lines: 15
In-Reply-To: alex@laos's message of 3 Sep 92 17:33:53 GMT

Reply to Parent Message