🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug21.183205.4726@mwhhlaw.uucp>, uunet!mwhhlaw!bob (Robert L. 
Hartley Jr.) writes:
> In article <1992Aug20.224819.1@capd.jhuapl.edu> waltrip@capd.jhuapl.edu  
> writes:
>> If you can find the time
> I don't know if it's a question of time.  We signed contracts not  
> circulate Beta stuff.
	Yup, I figured.  It took you time to put this post together and I
	thank you for it.
> 
> Maybe this will help.  
	It does.  It's design-level information and that's just what I need
	to get me by until 3.0 arrives.  It also provides a basis on which
	someone might be able to ask more specific (easier to answer)
	questions.  A very nice summary job.

	A couple of other kind people responded via email.  One of them
	indicated that DBKit was pretty much a straight entity-relationship
	model with no complex relationships and that you could do all the
	standard operations.  Both of them indicated that the beta
	documentation was still unhelpful and that DBKit was largely a
	moving target.  Even so, it sounds quite useful and I'm looking
	forward to it.

	For those who emailed me requesting I pass on the info I received,
	this is it 8^)

> About the time 3.0 comes out look for some third party objects and  
> palettes to enhance the list of interface objects to which properties  
> from the model can be connected.
	Nice approach.
> -- 
> Bob Hartley
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^
	Thanks again to you, Bob.

c.f.waltrip

Internet:	<waltrip@capsrv.jhuapl.edu>

Opinions expressed are my own.