Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer
Article #128Re: How about we solve the problem (was: How to Extend IconBuilder)
From: Gordon Van Huizen
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 09:38
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 09:38
72 lines
3708 bytes
3708 bytes
In article <HERRING.92Nov2172745@loke.iesd.auc.dk> herring@iesd.auc.dk (B. Erickson Herring) writes: > > I also mean no offense, but I have a queastion for you Gordon: > > Why do you program? Is this just a job, or what? If it _is_ just a > job, then surely your time is worth buying a "real" tool to do your > icons. > It's a job that I like quite a lot (note I'm reading Usenet news at 1:00 AM). I work about 70 hours a week. I'd buy a "real" tool if one were available. I didn't used to have to though, as Icon met my needs (although it was cryptic and buggy). You could do a lot of great stuff with it. Trust me - I buy a lot of "real" tools. > > Shouldn't you guys be using a graphic artist, anyway? > Well we've used several. It's difficult to find artists that are comfortable dealing with low-res graphics that are viewed in 2-bit, much less alpha channel considerations. We've had less than stellar results from otherwise-competent artists. There are some NeXT artists out there, but they're pretty expensive. I can't afford $1000 an icon, thank you. > > IconBuilder replaces nothing. Icon.app was a demo. It was completely > unsupported, no promises. It broke under 3.0, and the original author > has left the company to pursue other interests (if Sulley is to be > beleived, his initials were even removed from the 3.0 icons :-( ...). > I know the history pretty well. Just because something is in the demo folder doesn't mean that a community of people won't come to depend on it, especially in light of the lack of commercial alternatives. I'm not cheap, there just aren't any other options just yet. Also I'm not sure that a programmer leaving is a great reason to not continue supporting a piece of software. > I think that NeXT made a good faith effort to get us something, and > went one step further by giving us an opportunity to make a community > project out of it. If that is not enough for all of you that are > upset, your comments are probably welcome at NeXT. Like the plague, I > imagine... > I agree that "NeXT made a good faith effort to get us something". At first I was delighted that there was a replacement for Icon. But once I started to use it I realized it had about 1/5 of the capability. At least IconBuilder is in the /NextDeveloper/Apps folder - maybe we can imply it will be supported. A community project sounds like fun. Really. But until the project is over, we STILL need to make icons! Your final comment implies that you feel I hold hostility toward NeXT (or vice-versa). Not at all. I love the machine and I like working with the company (most of the time). There are some excellent people there, and I enjoy talking with them. I think there is room for polite criticism when it's due though, and this is a good forum to calmly discuss our feelings as a group. Gordon -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Van Huizen vox: 619.488.9411 fax: 619.488.3045 Metrosoft gvh@metrosoft.com [NeXTmail welcome] ----------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov3.093851.355@metrosoft.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!walter!bellcore!rutgers!psinntp!psinntp!hd0258!gvhReferences:
<HERRING.92Nov2172745@loke.iesd.auc.dk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!walter!bellcore!rutgers!psinntp!psinntp!hd0258!gvh From: gvh@metrosoft.com (Gordon Van Huizen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer Subject: Re: How about we solve the problem (was: How to Extend IconBuilder) Message-ID: <1992Nov3.093851.355@metrosoft.com> Date: 3 Nov 92 09:38:51 GMT References: <HERRING.92Nov2172745@loke.iesd.auc.dk> Sender: gvh@metrosoft.com Reply-To: gvh@metrosoft.com (Gordon Van Huizen) Organization: Metrosoft Lines: 72