Re: Missing files in /NextDevelopers/Headers: A survey

Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer

Article #1346

Back to comp.sys.next.programmer Previous Next

#1346

From: Christopher Songer
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 15:47

17 lines
1068 bytes

ram@ramsys.sta.sub.org writes:
>
[ ... Lots of Files ... ]
>
>NeXT2.1 looked like a (manual crippled) Mach/BSD development-system.
>3.0 now is ... well 3.0 :-( 
>
[ ... ]

I haven't had the time to play with 3.0 the way I would have liked,
however I did notice a directory off NextDeveloper (or was it
NextLibrary?) That had seemed to have to 2.1 headers. Assuming
I wasn't just hallucinating or misinterpreting it should be easy to
restore BSD compatibility since /usr/include is just a link under
3.0.

-Chris

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Oct08.154741.192767@lexmark.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!ukma!lexmark!songer

References: <1992Oct8.000406.1895@ramsys.sta.sub.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!ukma!lexmark!songer
From: songer@lexmark.com (Christopher Songer)
Subject: Re: Missing files in /NextDevelopers/Headers: A survey
Message-ID: <1992Oct08.154741.192767@lexmark.com>
X-Disclaimer: These views are the poster's and not necessarily those of Lexmark
Sender: usenet@lexmark.com (News Dude)
Nntp-Posting-Host: 9.51.7.57
Organization: Lexington, KY
References: <1992Oct8.000406.1895@ramsys.sta.sub.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 15:47:41 GMT
Lines: 18

Reply to Parent Message