Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer
Article #1566Re: Distributed Objects Experiment - Results
From: Kim Harding Christensen
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 07:05
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 07:05
34 lines
1596 bytes
1596 bytes
In article <1992Oct15.162455.152791@lexmark.com> songer@lexmark.com (Christopher Songer) writes: > In article <1992Oct14.052047.7056@cubetech.com> andrew@cubetech.com writes: > > > >Distributed Objects take all of the pain out of writing distributed or > >client/server apps. > > > > I agree with this completely! Distributed Objects seem to be the best > feature to 3.0 that I have seen. They are completely amazing. For > slight changes in your code structure, you can make your work > distributed and available. > > However, I would comment that the documentation for threaded Servers > under 3.0 looks terrible! > I agree too, but don't try to send perform: messages to a proxy it will crash the server. -kim ----------------------------------------------- Kim Harding Christensen khc@dannug.dk Korsgade 42, st (NeXTmail welcome) Aalborg Denmark. Phone: +45 98 12 20 44 -- ----------------------------------------------- Kim Harding Christensen khc@dannug.dk Korsgade 42, st (NeXTmail welcome) Aalborg
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bw7D1z.Ax@dannug.dk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!know!hri.com!ukma!gatech!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!sunic!dkuug!dannug!harding!khcReferences:
<1992Oct15.162455.152791@lexmark.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!know!hri.com!ukma!gatech!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!sunic!dkuug!dannug!harding!khc From: khc@dannug.dk (Kim Harding Christensen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer Subject: Re: Distributed Objects Experiment - Results Message-ID: <Bw7D1z.Ax@dannug.dk> Date: 16 Oct 92 07:05:59 GMT References: <1992Oct15.162455.152791@lexmark.com> Sender: khc@dannug.dk (Kim Harding Christensen) Reply-To: khc@dannug.dk Organization: Danish NeXT-Users group Lines: 34