Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer
Article #1910Re: gcc 2.3.1 on NeXTStep 3.0 ????
From: Michael Glenn
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 05:20
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 05:20
23 lines
1366 bytes
1366 bytes
In article <1992Nov24.021056.22646@leland.Stanford.EDU> kocks@leland.Stanford.EDU (Peter Kocks) writes: > Has gcc 2.3.1 been compiled successfully on NeXT 3.0 ?? > > If so, could someone please summarize and post (and maybe > put in the FAQ). I got gcc 2.2.2 to compile on NeXT 2.0 > fairly easily, I hope the new updates do not make it too difficult. > > Incidentally, what's the latest version of gdb and has it > been ported? > > --Peter Kocks > kocks@chemistry.stanford.edu gcc 2.3.1 compiled fine for me under 3.0, with one small hitch. The header file /usr/include/ansi/m68k/stdarg.h had two lines (line 4 and line 7) that were commented using // rather than /* */. After changing this, there were no problems. I find it doesn't seem to compile everything, and some things it gives gobs and gobs of new warnings... fermat@fermat.dartmouth.edu (NeXTmail ok)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov24.052016.19771@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rpi!bu.edu!dartvax!newsReferences:
<1992Nov24.021056.22646@leland.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rpi!bu.edu!dartvax!news From: fermat@fermat.dartmouth.edu (Michael Glenn) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer Subject: Re: gcc 2.3.1 on NeXTStep 3.0 ???? Message-ID: <1992Nov24.052016.19771@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Date: 24 Nov 92 05:20:16 GMT References: <1992Nov24.021056.22646@leland.Stanford.EDU> Sender: news@dartvax.dartmouth.edu (The News Manager) Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH Lines: 23