Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer
Article #1927Re: Font bug?
From: Scott Byer
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 00:42
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 00:42
28 lines
1726 bytes
1726 bytes
Sean Lamont writes > In "NeXT-ifying" some type 1 fonts I made the following discovery: > A number of fonts did not respond to the "lighter", "heavier" > buttons, although the weights were correct in the font file. > Have other people experienced this problem? Is it a postscript > weirdness or a bug? Well... It sounds like the AppKit is trying to determine if the font is a pi font or a roman character font so that it can turn off the Heavier/Lighter buttons for pi fonts (because, in general, pi fonts don't come in families with varied weights, so those buttons don't make sense). There is no sure way to tell, but the way most used is to check if the encoding is defined as StandardEncoding. I would be inclined to say that it's a problem with the fonts, that if they are standard roman-based fonts that they should be using StandardEncoding as their encoding vector. -- Scott Byer NeXTMail: byer@mv.us.adobe.com Adobe Systems Incorporated These are *my* opinions, and 1585 Charleston Road, P.O. Box 7900 do not necessarily reflect Mountain View, CA 94039-7900 the opinions of my employer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec22.004215.24848@adobe.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!ampex!decwrl!adobe!usenetReferences:
<1992Dec21.183057.7007@u.washington.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!ampex!decwrl!adobe!usenet From: byer@adobe.com (Scott Byer) Subject: Re: Font bug? Message-ID: <1992Dec22.004215.24848@adobe.com> Sender: usenet@adobe.com (USENET NEWS) Reply-To: byer@adobe.com (Scott Byer) Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated References: <1992Dec21.183057.7007@u.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 00:42:15 GMT Lines: 28