🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer
Article #2079

Re: Urge NeXT to support (complete) IXKit

#2079
From: Jack Greenfield
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:17
25 lines
1406 bytes
In article <11DEC199209422447@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>  
silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov (Dick Silbar) writes:
> In article <1992Dec11.032552.5430@ictv.com>, jcollas@ictv.com writes...
> # ...
> #Jack mentioned that all known bugs in the Indexing Kit are fixed in  
3.1,  
> #except for the ones that haven't been found yet ;-)  
> 
> I might have missed a turn here, but has NeXT ever announced that there
> WILL be a 3.1?
> 
>    Dick Silbar

I believe I stated that all known bugs have been fixed for the next  
release, with the exception of the query object.  The introduction of the  
numbers 3.1 are the author's.

There is another correction to be made.  In response to questions from  
attendees concerning feature additions to IXKit, I stated that NeXT would  
not continue to invest resources in the IXKit after fixing the known bugs  
for the next release.  When people expressed disappointment, and asked  
what they could do to affect that decision, I suggested they send mail to  
NeXT, making their opinions known.

J.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <6054@rosie.NeXT.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rosie!next.com
References: <11DEC199209422447@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rosie!next.com
From: jgreen@next.com (Jack Greenfield)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer
Subject: Re: Urge NeXT to support (complete) IXKit
Keywords: IXKit, IndexingKit, 3.1
Message-ID: <6054@rosie.NeXT.COM>
Date: 15 Dec 92 21:17:04 GMT
References: <11DEC199209422447@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>
Sender: news@NeXT.COM
Lines: 25