Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer
Article #2079Re: Urge NeXT to support (complete) IXKit
From: Jack Greenfield
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:17
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:17
25 lines
1406 bytes
1406 bytes
In article <11DEC199209422447@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov (Dick Silbar) writes: > In article <1992Dec11.032552.5430@ictv.com>, jcollas@ictv.com writes... > # ... > #Jack mentioned that all known bugs in the Indexing Kit are fixed in 3.1, > #except for the ones that haven't been found yet ;-) > > I might have missed a turn here, but has NeXT ever announced that there > WILL be a 3.1? > > Dick Silbar I believe I stated that all known bugs have been fixed for the next release, with the exception of the query object. The introduction of the numbers 3.1 are the author's. There is another correction to be made. In response to questions from attendees concerning feature additions to IXKit, I stated that NeXT would not continue to invest resources in the IXKit after fixing the known bugs for the next release. When people expressed disappointment, and asked what they could do to affect that decision, I suggested they send mail to NeXT, making their opinions known. J.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6054@rosie.NeXT.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rosie!next.comReferences:
<11DEC199209422447@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rosie!next.com From: jgreen@next.com (Jack Greenfield) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer Subject: Re: Urge NeXT to support (complete) IXKit Keywords: IXKit, IndexingKit, 3.1 Message-ID: <6054@rosie.NeXT.COM> Date: 15 Dec 92 21:17:04 GMT References: <11DEC199209422447@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> Sender: news@NeXT.COM Lines: 25