Re: Problems using gcc 2.3.3

Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer

Article #2188

Back to comp.sys.next.programmer Previous Next

#2188

From: Pascal Chesnais
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 20:11

15 lines
999 bytes

In article <1993Jan3.170501.242@glocke.hotb.sub.org>  
frank@glocke.hotb.sub.org (Frank Thomas) writes:
> YES,
> and the question raises again 
> WHY the hell can we not force NeXT to release it's changes to gcc.
> They must release the source if they distribute the binaries. 

uh,  dude chill,  NeXT has released the complete sources
to their modifications to gcc for 3.0...  It was a timely
release too.

They are even available on plethora.media.mit.edu via anon
f t p.

pasc

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan5.201106.556@news.media.mit.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!news

References: <1993Jan3.170501.242@glocke.hotb.sub.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!news
From: lacsap@plethora.media.mit.edu (Pascal Chesnais)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer
Subject: Re: Problems using gcc 2.3.3
Message-ID: <1993Jan5.201106.556@news.media.mit.edu>
Date: 5 Jan 93 20:11:06 GMT
References: <1993Jan3.170501.242@glocke.hotb.sub.org>
Sender: news@news.media.mit.edu (USENET News System)
Reply-To: csn@plethora.media.mit.edu
Organization: MIT Media Laboratory
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message