Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer
Article #2231Re: IB broken with custom Box classes?
From: Karl Kraft
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 23:25
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 23:25
28 lines
1630 bytes
1630 bytes
In article <1993Jan21.164823.1865@afs.com> greg@afs.com (Gregory H. Anderson) writes: >Has anyone else noticed braindead behavior for custom Box classes in IB >3.0? We have an AfsBox class with some additional ivars to secure the >contents. Of course, the Group operation doesn't work, so you have to >alt-drag objects into it individually. So far so good. But once they're >inside, IB refuses to recognize them as attachable (i.e., it won't draw >rings around them while you're alt-dragging). Has anyone else noticed >this, and has it been reported to NeXT? No I have a palette with a subclass of Box, and this behaviour doesn't happen at all. My version in Release 3.0 v359.0, which is what came with the release of 3.0. But then again: >Of course, the Group operation doesn't work, so you have to >alt-drag objects into it individually. It's a well known (and well documented) bug that you can't alt drag objects in IB anymore. So obviouslly we have differnent versions. Fess up, what version number do you have? -- __________ Karl Kraft karl@ensuing.com (NeXT mail)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9301212325.AA00341@ensuing.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!karl@ensuing.comReferences:
<1993Jan21.164823.1865@afs.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!karl@ensuing.com From: karl@ensuing.com (Karl Kraft) Subject: Re: IB broken with custom Box classes? Message-ID: <9301212325.AA00341@ensuing.com> Sender: daemon@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu Reply-To: karl@ensuing.com (Karl Kraft) Organization: Ensuing Technologies Inc. References: <1993Jan21.164823.1865@afs.com> Distribution: usa Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 23:25:59 GMT Lines: 29