Re: NXSplitView with VERTICAL bar

Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer

Article #327

Back to comp.sys.next.programmer Previous Next

#327

From: Gregory H. Anderson
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 23:26

19 lines
1258 bytes

In article <1992Jul26.132812.8839@cubetech.com> andrew@cubetech.com  
(Andrew Loewenstern) writes:
> 
> Anyone figure out why SideSplitView is so slow compared to SplitView?
> I looked at the code for a few minutes once but didn't see anything
> bad...
> 
I remember reading something to the effect that vertical SplitViews are  
vertical-refresh timing dependent (to scroll smoothly relative to the  
scanning frequency of the monitor), so there may be intentional wait  
states to synchronize and ensure smooth retracing. Horizontal SplitViews,  
obviously, do not suffer this problem, since they track with the scanning  
beam.

--
Gregory H. Anderson          | "We're very tolerant around here,
Benevolent Dictator-for-Life |  being only amateurs ourselves."
Anderson Financial Systems   | - Tortoise (Godel, Escher, Bach)
greg@afs.com  (Nextmail OK)  |

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Jul28.232608.1515@afs.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!afs!greg

References: <1992Jul26.132812.8839@cubetech.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!afs!greg
From: greg@afs.com (Gregory H. Anderson)
Subject: Re: NXSplitView with VERTICAL bar
Message-ID: <1992Jul28.232608.1515@afs.com>
Sender: greg@afs.com
Reply-To: greg@afs.com
References: <1992Jul26.132812.8839@cubetech.com>
Distribution: world,local
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 23:26:08 GMT
Lines: 19

Reply to Parent Message