Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer
Article #551Re: broken PostScript for colorimage
From: Ali Ozer
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 1992 01:02
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 1992 01:02
13 lines
1073 bytes
1073 bytes
In article <1992Apr3.072512.22668@csus.edu> eps@cs.sfsu.edu writes: >In article <3414@rosie.NeXT.COM> aozer@next.com (Ali Ozer) writes: >>3.0 writes the data inline (as binary if possible) and reads it with >>readhexstring; this solves the VM problem. >It seems to me that the current method would be superior for very >small images (e.g. icons) where VM consumption isn't the issue. >Speed and performance are important!! Yeah, except most printers don't garbage collect, and if you happen to write out a dozen or so "small" images, you might still eat up a significant piece of the PostScript VM available in the printer. Ali
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3490@rosie.NeXT.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!ditka!ntg!rosie!aozerReferences:
<1992Mar28.100804.12956@cs.tu-berlin.de> <3414@rosie.NeXT.COM> <1992Apr3.072512.22668@csus.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!ditka!ntg!rosie!aozer From: aozer@next.com (Ali Ozer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer Subject: Re: broken PostScript for colorimage Message-ID: <3490@rosie.NeXT.COM> Date: 4 Apr 92 01:02:35 GMT References: <1992Mar28.100804.12956@cs.tu-berlin.de> <3414@rosie.NeXT.COM> <1992Apr3.072512.22668@csus.edu> Sender: news@NeXT.COM Distribution: usa Organization: Next Computer, Inc. Lines: 13