Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer
Article #622Re: text with emacs binding - REQUEST
From: Michael Gersten
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 04:19
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 04:19
17 lines
1247 bytes
1247 bytes
In article <1992Mar25.153419.16666@sinix.UUCP> dhg@sinix.UUCP (David Griffith) writes: >Yes, I was wondering about this too, but from a different angle. The power >of NeXTStep would be greatly enhanced if you could "add value" to the >standard app kit objects such that all applications would inherit the >new functionality *without* recompilation. That way, developers could >sell value added versions of NeXTStep objects. I thought that Objective C allowed you to override parts of a class. So you could override the alloc, init, and free methods, and make sure that you set up a delegate that handled any new keystrokes. Or am I missing something very basic? -- Michael Gersten michael@stb.info.com HELLO! I'm a signature virus! Join in the fun and copy me into yours! ex:.-1,. w $HOME/.signature
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr11.041914.10574@stb.info.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!dlb!zygot!denwa!stb!michaelReferences:
<3293@rosie.NeXT.COM> <x!jtrj+@rpi.edu> <1992Mar25.153419.16666@sinix.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!dlb!zygot!denwa!stb!michael From: michael@stb.info.com (Michael Gersten) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer Subject: Re: text with emacs binding - REQUEST Message-ID: <1992Apr11.041914.10574@stb.info.com> Date: 11 Apr 92 04:19:14 GMT References: <3293@rosie.NeXT.COM> <x!jtrj+@rpi.edu> <1992Mar25.153419.16666@sinix.UUCP> Organization: STB BBS, La, Ca, 310 397 3137 Lines: 17