Article View: comp.sys.next.programmer
Article #639Re: text with emacs binding - REQUEST
From: User Account
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 21:44
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 21:44
23 lines
1560 bytes
1560 bytes
In article <1992Apr11.041914.10574@stb.info.com> michael@stb.info.com (Michael Gersten) writes: > In article <1992Mar25.153419.16666@sinix.UUCP> dhg@sinix.UUCP (David Griffith) writes: > >Yes, I was wondering about this too, but from a different angle. The power > >of NeXTStep would be greatly enhanced if you could "add value" to the > >standard app kit objects such that all applications would inherit the > >new functionality *without* recompilation. That way, developers could > >sell value added versions of NeXTStep objects. > > I thought that Objective C allowed you to override parts of a class. So you > could override the alloc, init, and free methods, and make sure that > you set up a delegate that handled any new keystrokes. > > Or am I missing something very basic? As he said, "..such that ALL APPLICATIONS [ie. existing ones] would inherit the new functionality *without* recompilation.." RTFMessage :) -- Daniel Faken / absinthe@u.washington.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr12.214404.27506@u.washington.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!sdd.hp.com!hp-cv!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!newsReferences:
<1992Apr11.041914.10574@stb.info.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!sdd.hp.com!hp-cv!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!news From: absinthe@topo.chem.washington.edu (User Account) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer Subject: Re: text with emacs binding - REQUEST Message-ID: <1992Apr12.214404.27506@u.washington.edu> Date: 12 Apr 92 21:44:04 GMT Article-I.D.: u.1992Apr12.214404.27506 References: <1992Apr11.041914.10574@stb.info.com> Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System) Reply-To: absinthe@u.washington.edu Organization: University of Washington Lines: 23