Re: Good Perfmeter?

Article View: comp.sys.next.software

Article #1000

Back to comp.sys.next.software Previous Next

#1000

From: Stuart Ritchie
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 22:46

10 lines
947 bytes

tlm@iastate.edu (Dr. T.L. Marchioro II) writes:
>Well, performance monitors, like text editors and several other things, 
>seem to be largely a matter of opinion, but the best one I've seen is 
>KPerfMon which should be on Sonata.  It has the basic idea of TimeMon
>by Scott Hess (itself my *second* favorite :-) in that it outputs to its
>own Icon,but you can choose a variety of quantities to monitor.

I like KPerfMon too, but it dies under 3.0!  :-(

Stuart

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1b5245INN815@stephen.cs.ubc.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!stephen.cs.ubc.ca!not-for-mail

References: <1992Oct8.184158.8502@puma.ATL.GE.COM> <tlm.718669285@scl1.al.iastate.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!stephen.cs.ubc.ca!not-for-mail
From: sritchie@cs.ubc.ca (Stuart Ritchie)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
Subject: Re: Good Perfmeter?
Date: 9 Oct 1992 15:46:29 -0700
Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <1b5245INN815@stephen.cs.ubc.ca>
References: <1992Oct8.184158.8502@puma.ATL.GE.COM> <tlm.718669285@scl1.al.iastate.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: stephen.cs.ubc.ca

Reply to Parent Message