Article View: comp.sys.next.software
Article #1234Re: How's Framemaker 3.0 under NeXTstep 3.0?
From: M Carling
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1992 16:12
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1992 16:12
17 lines
1100 bytes
1100 bytes
In article <1992Sep30.125802.5564@stc.nato.int> koelman@cuby.stc.nl (Ton
Koelman) writes:
>
> Subject line says it. Any problems?
So long as you have an ample sufficiency of memory, Frame works as well as
it does under 2.1.
M Carling
Director, Bay Area NeXT Group
General Manager, NetForce Inc.
--
"High tech is potent, precise, and in the end, unbeatable. The truth is,
it reminds a lot of people of the way I pitch horseshoes. Would you
believe some of the people? Would you believe our dog? Look, I want to
give the high-five signal to high tech."
George Bush, 4/25/89
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct2.161257.29008@leland.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!newsReferences:
<1992Sep30.125802.5564@stc.nato.int>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news From: m@crito.stanford.edu (M Carling) Subject: Re: How's Framemaker 3.0 under NeXTstep 3.0? Message-ID: <1992Oct2.161257.29008@leland.Stanford.EDU> Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News) Reply-To: mcarling@NetForce.com (M Carling) Organization: DSO, Stanford University References: <1992Sep30.125802.5564@stc.nato.int> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 16:12:57 GMT Lines: 17