Article View: comp.sys.next.software
Article #1357Fix for lisp in 3.0?
From: James Dehnert
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 01:38
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 01:38
11 lines
663 bytes
663 bytes
I may have mised it, but is there a fix for Lisp in 3.0?
Thanks,
Zeke
--
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
= James "Zeke" Dehnert zeke@mode.css.gov =
+ SAIC Geophysical Div. Eschew Obfuscation +
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1069@esosun.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!seismo!esosun!zekeShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!seismo!esosun!zeke From: zeke@esosun.UUCP (James Dehnert) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software Subject: Fix for lisp in 3.0? Message-ID: <1069@esosun.UUCP> Date: 19 Nov 92 01:38:04 GMT Reply-To: zeke@anext.cts.com Organization: Science Applications International Corp., San Diego Lines: 11