Article View: comp.sys.next.software
Article #1562Re: NeXT Word Processors - Junk, garbage, and more junk...
From: Peter Kocks
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 20:13
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 20:13
21 lines
1559 bytes
1559 bytes
Could someone please explain what is meant when someone says, "NeXT needs a *REAL* wordprocessor". What is a *REAL* wordprocessor and what does it do that one of FrameMaker, WP, or WriteNow does not do? (add TeX to that list). I'm really curious. I understand that NeXT does not have a native MS-WORD port (although you can run it through executor if you want). I also understand that some people just love MS-WORD and have essentially grown-up on it. While it is very nice, it is IMHO far from perfect. Moreover, on a NeXT, any of the exisiting wordprocessors use DPS so you truly get what you see (much better than WORD, for example). Also, the NeXT mail makes working on complex documents over a network relatively easy compared to most other machines. You CAN do similar things on other platforms, but it usually requires a lot of configuration work and additional products. Everyone who has a NeXT has NeXTMail. --Peter Kocks kocks@chemistry.stanford.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec14.201322.6826@leland.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!leland.Stanford.EDU!kocksReferences:
<Bz137t.2Io@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <5393@disuns2.epfl.ch> <1get2pINN6l7@phakt.usc.edu> <1geub7INN6r5@phakt.usc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!leland.Stanford.EDU!kocks From: kocks@leland.Stanford.EDU (Peter Kocks) Subject: Re: NeXT Word Processors - Junk, garbage, and more junk... Message-ID: <1992Dec14.201322.6826@leland.Stanford.EDU> Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News) Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA References: <Bz137t.2Io@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <5393@disuns2.epfl.ch> <1get2pINN6l7@phakt.usc.edu> <1geub7INN6r5@phakt.usc.edu> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 20:13:22 GMT Lines: 22