Article View: comp.sys.next.software
Article #1567Re: NeXT Word Processors - Junk, garbage, and more junk...
From: Robert Alexander Wyatt
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 01:32
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 01:32
12 lines
1127 bytes
1127 bytes
In regard to Peter Kocks's comments... You are right...WP apps for NeXT are functional...that's it...what people want is more power, a better interface, and more features...I don't want something bloated like MS-WORD (I hate MicroSoft and hope they NEVER develop for NeXT... NeXT is too cool a platform to be plagued by their garbage)...I personally would something full featured and less buggy...Word Pefect has a lot features and a lot of bugs...WriteNow has few features and few bugs...can't anyone get it right??? -Rob
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1gjcj9INN1mu@phakt.usc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!chaph.usc.edu!phakt.usc.edu!not-for-mailReferences:
<1get2pINN6l7@phakt.usc.edu> <1geub7INN6r5@phakt.usc.edu> <1992Dec14.201322.6826@leland.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!chaph.usc.edu!phakt.usc.edu!not-for-mail From: rawyatt@phakt.usc.edu (Robert Alexander Wyatt) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software Subject: Re: NeXT Word Processors - Junk, garbage, and more junk... Date: 14 Dec 1992 17:32:25 -0800 Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Lines: 12 Distribution: world Message-ID: <1gjcj9INN1mu@phakt.usc.edu> References: <1get2pINN6l7@phakt.usc.edu> <1geub7INN6r5@phakt.usc.edu> <1992Dec14.201322.6826@leland.Stanford.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: phakt.usc.edu