🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec15.220409.28619@athena.mit.edu> zmonster@athena.mit.edu (Eric M Hermanson) writes:
>>In article <1992Dec13.205727.20660@fcom.cc.utah.edu> yf5990@u.cc.utah.edu (Yan Fang/Humanities) writes:
>>>In article <1992Dec11.212746.1895@cubetech.com> andrew@cubetech.com writes:
>>>>In article <1992Dec10.141950.9223@chromagrafx.com> msb@chromagrafx.com writes:
>>>>>after they buy Image.  When I saw it at Seybold they had most of the features
>>>>>of Photoshop but were greatly lacking in speed and it seemed that it crawled
>>>>>when making changes to the image.  
>>>>
>>>>The new beta of Image is significantly faster than the previous ones.
>>>
>>>The new beta of Image is fast and highly Photoshop competitive, feature
>>>for feature as well as performance-wise. When Image hits the streets this
>>>thread may never again surface--it's really that good. Just don't try to
>>>edit CMYK images on a 16MB color slab--RGBA screams, however.
>>
>
>When is RETOUCHE supposed to be released?  I heard it will have retouching
>features comparable to a $500,000 SCITEX machine.

Well, so does photoshop, it's just not going to be quite as fast as,
say a Scitex Blaze on a NSTC.


andrew
-- 
andrew@cubetech.com      |  "C++'s runtime sucks shit!  Virtual functions
Andrew Loewenstern       |   can go straight to hell!"  - Ron Pomeroy
Cube Technologies, Inc.  |                   ForYourEyesOnly public key:
0000000701B61D1ADF0DFC9C16185CEA055200000007EB4A9FEB1922065D471A89E905B5