Re: ObjectStore OODBMS to be in NeXTstep in 1993!

Article View: comp.sys.next.software

Article #174

Back to comp.sys.next.software Previous Next

#174

From: Marcos Polanco
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 15:52

16 lines
1182 bytes

In article <1992Jul22.122930.2085@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mdw@cbnewsg.cb.att.com  
(mark.d.wuest) writes:
> Versant's seems to be easy, but C++ oriented.  You basically inherit  
from
> a class they provide and declare your object as persistent.
> 

Problem is, it does not really matter. NeXT has chosen to favor one  
competitor over another. This may be good, seeing as Microsoft, for  
example, is building database capabilities into the Object Filing System,  
to be part of some future Win-doze version. In general, I think the future  
holds the canning of the file system for a full-on database, so NeXT may  
just be (again) ahead of their time. Gotta go!

(Please move discussion to advocacy)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Jul22.155249.556@leland.Stanford.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news

References: <1992Jul22.122930.2085@cbfsb.cb.att.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software,comp.sys.next.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news
From: overlord@leland.stanford.edu (Marcos Polanco)
Subject: Re: ObjectStore OODBMS to be in NeXTstep in 1993!
Message-ID: <1992Jul22.155249.556@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
Organization: DSO, Stanford University
References: <1992Jul22.122930.2085@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 15:52:49 GMT
Lines: 19

Reply to Parent Message