Article View: comp.sys.next.software
Article #225Re: ObjectStore OODBMS to be in NeXTstep in 1993!
From: Jon Rosen
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 04:39
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 04:39
21 lines
1573 bytes
1573 bytes
In article <1992Jul22.155249.556@leland.Stanford.EDU> overlord@leland.stanford.edu (Marcos Polanco) writes: >In article <1992Jul22.122930.2085@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mdw@cbnewsg.cb.att.com >(mark.d.wuest) writes: >> Versant's seems to be easy, but C++ oriented. You basically inherit >from >> a class they provide and declare your object as persistent. > >Problem is, it does not really matter. NeXT has chosen to favor one >competitor over another. This may be good, seeing as Microsoft, for >example, is building database capabilities into the Object Filing System, >to be part of some future Win-doze version. In general, I think the future >holds the canning of the file system for a full-on database, so NeXT may >just be (again) ahead of their time. Gotta go! Not! :-) The PICK operating system as well as the IBM System 38 operating systems are both based on database structures rather than file systems. The S/38's DBMS is now used in the AS/400 and is better known as SQL/400. NeXT may be ahead of the mainstream but they are clearly, in this case, relative latecomers. Jon Rosen
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul29.043911.5426@redbrick.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!spunky!jfrReferences:
<1992Jul22.122930.2085@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <1992Jul22.155249.556@leland.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software,comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!spunky!jfr From: jfr@redbrick.com (Jon Rosen) Subject: Re: ObjectStore OODBMS to be in NeXTstep in 1993! Message-ID: <1992Jul29.043911.5426@redbrick.com> Organization: Red Brick Systems, Los Gatos, CA References: <1992Jul22.122930.2085@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <1992Jul22.155249.556@leland.Stanford.EDU> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 04:39:11 GMT Lines: 21