🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Jul31.194615.24025@cs.yale.edu>  
nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu (Nathan F. Janette) writes:
> 
> The contortions one has to go through to register MMa,
> especially multiple copies, are not representative of
> a good copy protection scheme which protects the program
> but doesn't hassle the user.  We have other apps that are
> copy protected that weren't nearly the hassle to register
> and use, but still can't be stolen by someone copying
> them - they just work in demo mode without a valid keyfile.
> 

Speaking as a company that is reluctantly considering copy-protecting one  
of our products, I'd like to know if end-users find any of the current  
schemes truly acceptable. We've been weighing the pros and cons of  
registering to a username or machine ID. Neither seens completely  
acceptable to us. 

What do you folks think?

Gordon


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Van Huizen           vox: 619.488.9411  fax: 619.488.3045
Metrosoft                   gvh@metrosoft.com [NeXTmail welcome]
----------------------------------------------------------------