Article View: comp.sys.next.software
Article #292Re: Copy Protection
From: Lytras Apostolos
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1992 08:10
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1992 08:10
41 lines
2883 bytes
2883 bytes
In article <2A7F5D92.28501@noiro.acs.uci.edu> rmyers@dec5200.acs.uci.edu (Richard Myers) writes: >In article <810@rtbrain.rightbrain.com> glenn@rightbrain.com writes: >>It might inconvenience you to not be able to copy and use software >>on several machines, or at home. It's also inconvenient for you to >>photocopy a book and bind it so you can have a copy at home and at work. >>If you could make an identical copy of a book as easily as you can make >>an identical copy of a piece of software, books would probably cost >>$500 too. >I suppose this is true, but a backpack only costs 15-50 bucks, but >a portable NeXT (ehem) costs $4000+? when it arrives? >Makes it a bit more expensive to carry software to and from work than >to carry books. I don't understand why some people always have to come up comparing software to books. I really do not see any sense in that comparison. Computers & Software were made to make work more efficient and less depending from place & time. The same cannot be said about books. And I can assure you that from the view of a bibliophile a book and a piece of software are clearly distinguishable. (BTW: Books happen to be so expensive in Switzerland that most of our students *have* the books *copied* at some copy shop and still get it for less. If you need a book for your work, let your employer pay one copy and then have it xeroxed somewhere, that's what most people think in regard to books that concern them professionally. Most European countries are in the process of making laws for software (most have no appropriate legislation) and they tend to state that using software at home for which your employer has bought a licence and which you are also using in the office (when you happen to be there) should be definitely *legal*, because you are not making more profit out of it than you would if you spent all of your day in the office, just because the software is there... If your firm thinks about going to market its products internationally, think about this and forget about checking serial numbers of hosts or similarily stupid stuff.) Just my 0.02 Swiss Franks - Apostolos -- lytras@ifi.unizh.ch | Apostolos Lytras lytras@avalon.physik.unizh.ch | Informatik Club der Uni lytras@amiga.physik.unizh.ch | Zuerich, SysAdmin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug5.081004.20434@ifi.unizh.ch>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!chx400!josef!avalon.physik.unizh.ch!lytrasReferences:
<1992Aug4.203450.25362@menudo.uh.edu> <810@rtbrain.rightbrain.com> <2A7F5D92.28501@noiro.acs.uci.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!chx400!josef!avalon.physik.unizh.ch!lytras From: lytras@avalon.physik.unizh.ch (Lytras Apostolos) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software Subject: Re: Copy Protection Message-ID: <1992Aug5.081004.20434@ifi.unizh.ch> Date: 5 Aug 92 08:10:04 GMT References: <1992Aug4.203450.25362@menudo.uh.edu> <810@rtbrain.rightbrain.com> <2A7F5D92.28501@noiro.acs.uci.edu> Sender: news@ifi.unizh.ch (USENET News Admin) Organization: Informatik Club Uni Zurich Lines: 41 Nntp-Posting-Host: avalon