Article View: comp.sys.next.software
Article #439Re: PasteUp vs PageMaker vs Quark (RTF)
From: Scott Hess
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 23:08
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 23:08
48 lines
3046 bytes
3046 bytes
In article <873@rtbrain.rightbrain.com>, glenn@rightbrain.com (Glenn Reid), who is being portrayed by Jack Reynolds, writes: >While Glenn has been working hard to get the software out the door, >others have been assembling this comparison. > >If you'd like to know more, fire an email to reynolds@rightbrain.com >because the reply address on this post is to Glenn's account, not >mine. He disabled my machine from posting (but was foolish enough >to leave his machine logged in and unattended!). <large RTF posting omitted> Hopefully this time around Glenn will take more vigorous action - like breaking your fingers or something. I don't know if you read these groups (apparently not), but Netnews is _not_ there for companies to make profit from. Self-serving advertisements certainly qualify as commercial for-profit usage. While on one group we have a discussion about whether we should post prices or not, on another we've got Jack Reynolds saving RightBrain a couple thousand by posting 4 page advertisements to the network rather than buying space in NeXTWorld. There is a _very_ large gray area covering the space between entirely non-commercial posts and fully-commercial posts. You are not even _close_ to that gray area. If we wanted to know about PasteUp, we would ask. If you want to tell us about it, you could mention in the next PasteUp press release that this document is available by sending email to reynolds@rightbrain.com. It really isn't that hard. I've seen nothing like what you post from any of your competitors, so it's obviously not impossible. [To those of you who may think I'm coming down a little hard, an excuse ... I've had a couple posts over the last few weeks which I thought skirted dangerously close to being for-profit. I went over them with a fine-toothed comb reworking them to be as generally applicable as possible, and left them on my system for a couple days so that I could make absolutely certain that they looked acceptable in the life of a new morning. With this one post Jack has probably posted an equivalent amount of hype to what everyone else posted this month. And, not only does he post it, he _brags_ about how he snuck behind his boss' back to do it. Grrr ...] Later, -- scott hess <shess@ssesco.com> <Who achieved programmer nirvana on Aug 11th> 12901 Upton Avenue South, #326 Burnsville, MN 55337 (612) 895-1208 Anytime! <Text: One Class to bring them all and in the darkness bind them ...>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<SCOTT.92Sep4230802@nic.gac.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!msus1.msus.edu!gacvx2.gac.edu!gacvax2!scottReferences:
<873@rtbrain.rightbrain.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!msus1.msus.edu!gacvx2.gac.edu!gacvax2!scott Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software Subject: Re: PasteUp vs PageMaker vs Quark (RTF) Message-ID: <SCOTT.92Sep4230802@nic.gac.edu> From: scott@nic.gac.edu (Scott Hess) Date: 4 Sep 92 23:08:02 References: <873@rtbrain.rightbrain.com> Organization: Gustavus Adolphus College Nntp-Posting-Host: nic.gac.edu In-reply-to: glenn@rightbrain.com's message of 3 Sep 92 06:36:15 GMTLines: 48 Lines: 48