🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.next.software
Article #439

Re: PasteUp vs PageMaker vs Quark (RTF)

#439
From: Scott Hess
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 23:08
48 lines
3046 bytes
In article <873@rtbrain.rightbrain.com>,
	glenn@rightbrain.com (Glenn Reid), who is being portrayed
	by Jack Reynolds, writes:
>While Glenn has been working hard to get the software out the door,
>others have been assembling this comparison.
>
>If you'd like to know more, fire an email to reynolds@rightbrain.com
>because the reply address on this post is to Glenn's account, not
>mine.  He disabled my machine from posting (but was foolish enough
>to leave his machine logged in and unattended!).

<large RTF posting omitted>

Hopefully this time around Glenn will take more vigorous action -
like breaking your fingers or something.  I don't know if you read
these groups (apparently not), but Netnews is _not_ there for
companies to make profit from.  Self-serving advertisements certainly
qualify as commercial for-profit usage.  While on one group we have
a discussion about whether we should post prices or not, on another
we've got Jack Reynolds saving RightBrain a couple thousand by
posting 4 page advertisements to the network rather than buying
space in NeXTWorld.  There is a _very_ large gray area covering
the space between entirely non-commercial posts and fully-commercial
posts.  You are not even _close_ to that gray area.

If we wanted to know about PasteUp, we would ask.  If you want to
tell us about it, you could mention in the next PasteUp press
release that this document is available by sending email to
reynolds@rightbrain.com.  It really isn't that hard.  I've seen
nothing like what you post from any of your competitors, so it's
obviously not impossible.

[To those of you who may think I'm coming down a little hard, an
excuse ... I've had a couple posts over the last few weeks which
I thought skirted dangerously close to being for-profit.  I went
over them with a fine-toothed comb reworking them to be as generally
applicable as possible, and left them on my system for a couple
days so that I could make absolutely certain that they looked
acceptable in the life of a new morning.  With this one post Jack
has probably posted an equivalent amount of hype to what everyone
else posted this month.  And, not only does he post it, he _brags_
about how he snuck behind his boss' back to do it.  Grrr ...]

Later,
--
scott hess <shess@ssesco.com>  <Who achieved programmer nirvana on Aug 11th>
12901 Upton Avenue South, #326  Burnsville, MN 55337 (612) 895-1208 Anytime!
   <Text: One Class to bring them all and in the darkness bind them ...>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <SCOTT.92Sep4230802@nic.gac.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!msus1.msus.edu!gacvx2.gac.edu!gacvax2!scott
References: <873@rtbrain.rightbrain.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!msus1.msus.edu!gacvx2.gac.edu!gacvax2!scott
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
Subject: Re: PasteUp vs PageMaker vs Quark (RTF)
Message-ID: <SCOTT.92Sep4230802@nic.gac.edu>
From: scott@nic.gac.edu (Scott Hess)
Date: 4 Sep 92 23:08:02
References: <873@rtbrain.rightbrain.com>
Organization: Gustavus Adolphus College
Nntp-Posting-Host: nic.gac.edu
In-reply-to: glenn@rightbrain.com's message of 3 Sep 92 06:36:15 GMTLines: 48
Lines: 48