Re: PasteUp vs PageMaker vs Quark (RTF)

Article View: comp.sys.next.software

Article #444

Back to comp.sys.next.software Previous Next

#444

From: Marcos Javier Polanco
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1992 17:49

9 lines
769 bytes

>Like a pink slip.  You are hurting your own company, Jack Reynolds!

I agree. If users had no choice then I'd make a face and still fork over  
cash for PasteUp. Now I swear I will wait for Archetype and Pages to ship  
their products. That's one lost sale!

-Marcos J. Polanco
-shiva@vega.stanford.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep5.174919.29720@leland.Stanford.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!morrow.stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news

References: <1992Sep5.141150.10430@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!morrow.stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news
From: shiva@vega.Stanford.EDU (Marcos Javier Polanco)
Subject: Re: PasteUp vs PageMaker vs Quark (RTF)
Message-ID: <1992Sep5.174919.29720@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
Organization: DSO, Stanford University
References: <1992Sep5.141150.10430@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 92 17:49:19 GMT
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message