Re: NeXTStep query

Article View: comp.sys.next.software

Article #47

Back to comp.sys.next.software Previous Next

#47

From: Stuart Ritchie
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 01:31

16 lines
1205 bytes

In article <2AF02742.2E2E@deneva.sdd.trw.com> blanford@spf.trw.com (Ronald P. Blanford) writes:
>The development environment you get with Borland C++ for DOS is  
>miles ahead of NeXT in terms of compilation speed,  
>interactivity, ease of use, debugging ability, and project  
>management.  InterfaceBuilder is good, but Unix tools in general  
>lag far behind commercial DOS offerings for usability.

Ha ha ha.  That's a good one.  The only thing good about
development under DOS is that rebooting is fairly quick
compared to Unix.  But then again, Unix people don't need
to reboot every time their code crashes.

I'd take memory protection over the flourescent puke
coloured Borland screens any day.

Stuart

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1cq39tINNbmt@stephen.cs.ubc.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!stephen.cs.ubc.ca!not-for-mail

References: <8ew0yhy00iUyQ2Avk2@andrew.cmu.edu> <2AF02742.2E2E@deneva.sdd.trw.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!stephen.cs.ubc.ca!not-for-mail
From: sritchie@cs.ubc.ca (Stuart Ritchie)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
Subject: Re: NeXTStep query
Date: 29 Oct 1992 17:31:41 -0800
Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <1cq39tINNbmt@stephen.cs.ubc.ca>
References: <8ew0yhy00iUyQ2Avk2@andrew.cmu.edu> <2AF02742.2E2E@deneva.sdd.trw.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: stephen.cs.ubc.ca

Reply to Parent Message